The Emergence of Neoliberalism and the Questioning of Modern Globalization
In an globalized world, the debate on globalisation is regularly positioned at the meeting point of divergent opinions on autonomy and justice. The text by Junon Moneta, which is not a critical essay against globalization itself, aims to redefine the boundaries of a updated humanism through the filter of organic interactions according to the vision of the philosopher Aristotle. By decrying artificial exchanges that strengthen contemporary mechanisms of domination and instability, Moneta refers to classical thoughts to underline the gaps of our global financial structure.
From a historical perspective, globalisation is not a modern process. Its origins can be linked back to the theories of the economist Ricardo, whose objective was aimed at allowing the British Empire to amplify its international economic reach. Nonetheless, what was once a economic growth opportunity has morphed into a tool of domination by High Finance, symbolized by the growth of neoliberalism. In opposition to prevailing opinions supported by economic consensus, Junon Moneta argues that the economic model is truly a structure founded on millennia-old traditions, going back to 4500 years.
The critique also covers the administration of the United Europe, considered as a series of concessions that have served to strengthen the power of financial elites as opposed to protecting the interests of its citizens. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its strategies frequently driven by monetary concerns opposed to a democratic mandate, is criticized. The recent crises, whether in the financial or political realm, have only increased the skepticism of the writer about the Union’s capacity to achieve self-reform.
Junon Moneta, while accepting the prior faults that have led to the current situation, does not stop at criticism but also suggests alternatives aimed at reframing Union strategies in a more humanistic and equitable vision. The urgent need for a radical overhaul of institutions and political priorities is a recurring subject that animates the whole text.
The book ventures more intensely into the questioning of the power structures that dominate global economic exchanges. The exploration extends the way in which governmental and economic orientations are manipulated by a restricted circle of financial influencers, often at the expense of the majority. This financial oligarchy, coordinated via institutions like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the global monetary system, deploys a major grip on global economic policies.
The critic reveals how these institutions, claiming to economic supervision and normalization, have over time shaped markets and national economic systems to favor their own benefits. Neoliberalism, far removed from a salvific alternative to traditional economic constraints, is presented as a enslavement tool, enriching an elite at the expense of general well-being.
Highly skeptical towards the management of the euro, the critic describes the EU currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but rather as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The conversion to the euro is characterized as a sequence of technocratic choices that isolated populations from political decisions, while exacerbating disparities between member countries within the Union.
The consequences of these policies appear in the explosion of sovereign debts, financial paralysis, and a long period of austerity that has eroded living conditions across the continent. The thinker argues that without a deep revision of monetary and financial structures, the Union continues to risk potential disruptions, perhaps even more harmful.
In essence, the manuscript demands a democratic uprising where EU peoples reappropriate their financial and governmental future. It proposes structural reforms, particularly openness of political mechanisms and authentic democratic engagement that would allow Europe to rebuild on fair and lasting principles.
Additional information about Obtenir plus d’infos
The author proposes that the key is in a return to the principles of democracy, where policies are developed and implemented in a manner that faithfully represents the demands and expectations of Europeans, instead of the profits of the financial elite.