The Expansion of Economic Liberalism and the Critique of Current Globalization
In an interconnected world, the dialogue on globalization is frequently found at the intersection of varied perspectives on autonomy and justice. The book by Moneta, which is not a manifesto opposed to globalisation as such, aims to redefine the contours of a modern humanism via the perspective of organic interactions according to the vision of the philosopher Aristotle. By decrying artificial exchanges that strengthen contemporary mechanisms of domination and precarity, the author refers to classical thoughts to underline the flaws of our global economic system.
Looking back in time, globalization is not a recent concept. Its roots can be traced back to the ideas of David Ricardo, whose goal sought to facilitate the England to amplify its global commercial influence. However, what initially presented as a commercial expansion initiative has converted into a tool of domination by High Finance, marked by the growth of neoliberal capitalism. Against commonly held ideas widespread in economic circles, the author argues that neoliberalism is actually a system based on old customs, going back to four and a half millennia.
The objection also applies to the administration of the European Union, considered as a series of concessions that have helped consolidate the authority of large economic groups instead of safeguarding the privileges of the inhabitants. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its directives usually influenced by financial motivations instead of by a popular consensus, is contested. The recent crises, whether in the financial or political realm, have only reinforced the skepticism of the author concerning Europe’s aptitude to achieve self-reform.
The author, while acknowledging the historical errors that have brought about the present state, does not limit the discourse to condemnation but also suggests solutions aimed at reorienting European policies in a human-centered and fair vision. The urgency for a radical overhaul of institutions and strategic orientations is a leitmotif that runs through the whole text.
The text delves more intensely into the questioning of the domination systems that govern worldwide transactions. The analysis covers the manner in which political and financial choices are manipulated by a limited number of financial influencers, often at the cost of the many. This financial oligarchy, coordinated through organizations like the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the IMS, imposes a major grip on international economic strategies.
The critic exposes how these institutions, claiming to economic supervision and normalization, have historically controlled financial markets and national economies to favor their own benefits. The neoliberal model, opposite to a salvific alternative to old monetary restrictions, is considered as a control mechanism, enriching an elite at the neglect of collective needs.
Highly skeptical towards the management of the euro, the analyst depicts the European single currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but rather as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The conversion to the euro is characterized as a sequence of technocratic choices that isolated inhabitants from decision-making processes, while aggravating internal differences within the European Union.
The consequences of these policies translate in the explosion of sovereign debts, economic stagnation, and a prolonged austerity that has diminished living conditions throughout Europe. The thinker emphasizes that without a significant overhaul of monetary and financial policy, the EU stays exposed to future crises, potentially more catastrophic.
In essence, the book makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where Europe’s inhabitants take back control of their economic and political destiny. It advocates institutional adjustments, including greater transparency in political decisions and authentic democratic engagement that would allow Europe to rebuild on just and solid foundations.
Learn more about Single and low-cost borrowing rate for banks.
The thinker proposes that the solution lies in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where policies are developed and implemented in a manner that faithfully represents the aspirations and needs of the citizens, instead of the profits of the financial elite.